The three ways that good design makes you happy | Don Norman

The three ways that good design makes you happy | Don Norman

The new me is beauty. (Laughter) Yeah, people used to say, “Norman’s OK, but if you followed what he said, everything would be usable but it would be ugly.” Well, I didn’t have that in mind, so … This is neat. Thank you for setting up my display. I mean, it’s just wonderful. And I haven’t the slightest idea of what it does or what it’s good for, but I want it. And that’s my new life. My new life is trying to understand what beauty is about, and “pretty,” and “emotions.” The new me is all about making things kind of neat and fun. And so this is a Philippe Starck juicer, produced by Alessi. It’s just neat; it’s fun. It’s so much fun I have it in my house — but I have it in the entryway, I don’t use it to make juice. (Laughter) In fact, I bought the gold-plated special edition and it comes with a little slip of paper that says, “Don’t use this juicer to make juice.” The acid will ruin the gold plating. (Laughter) So actually, I took a carton of orange juice and I poured it in the glass to take this picture. (Laughter) Beneath it is a wonderful knife. It’s a Global cutting knife made in Japan. First of all, look at the shape — it’s just wonderful to look at. Second of all, it’s really beautifully balanced: it holds well, it feels well. And third of all, it’s so sharp, it just cuts. It’s a delight to use. And so it’s got everything, right? It’s beautiful and it’s functional. And I can tell you stories about it, which makes it reflective, and so you’ll see I have a theory of emotion. And those are the three components. Hiroshi Ishii and his group at the MIT Media Lab took a ping-pong table and placed a projector above it, and on the ping-pong table they projected an image of water with fish swimming in it. And as you play ping-pong, whenever the ball hits part of the table, the ripples spread out and the fish run away. But of course, then the ball hits the other side, the ripples hit the — poor fish, they can’t find any peace and quiet. (Laughter) Is that a good way to play ping-pong? No. But is it fun? Yeah! Yeah. Or look at Google. If you type in, oh say, “emotion and design,” you get 10 pages of results. So Google just took their logo and they spread it out. Instead of saying, “You got 73,000 results. This is one through 20. Next,” they just give you as many o’s as there are pages. It’s really simple and subtle. I bet a lot of you have seen it and never noticed it. That’s the subconscious mind that sort of notices it — it probably is kind of pleasant and you didn’t know why. And it’s just clever. And of course, what’s especially good is, if you type “design and emotion,” the first response out of those 10 pages is my website. (Laughter) Now, the weird thing is Google lies, because if I type “design and emotion,” it says, “You don’t need the ‘and.’ We do it anyway.” So, OK. So I type “design emotion” and my website wasn’t first again. It was third. Oh well, different story. There was this wonderful review in The New York Times about the MINI Cooper automobile. It said, “You know, this is a car that has lots of faults. Buy it anyway. It’s so much fun to drive.” And if you look at the inside of the car — I mean, I loved it, I wanted to see it, I rented it, this is me taking a picture while my son is driving — and the inside of the car, the whole design is fun. It’s round, it’s neat. The controls work wonderfully. So that’s my new life; it’s all about fun. I really have the feeling that pleasant things work better, and that never made any sense to me until I finally figured out — look … I’m going to put a plank on the ground. So, imagine I have a plank about two feet wide and 30 feet long and I’m going to walk on it, and you see I can walk on it without looking, I can go back and forth and I can jump up and down. No problem. Now I’m going to put the plank 300 feet in the air — and I’m not going to go near it, thank you. Intense fear paralyzes you. It actually affects the way the brain works. So, Paul Saffo, before his talk said that he didn’t really have it down until just a few days or hours before the talk, and that anxiety was really helpful in causing him to focus. That’s what fear and anxiety does; it causes you to be — what’s called depth-first processing — to focus, not be distracted. And I couldn’t force myself across that. Now some people can — circus workers, steel workers. But it really changes the way you think. And then, a psychologist, Alice Isen, did this wonderful experiment. She brought students in to solve problems. So, she’d bring people into the room, and there’d be a string hanging down here and a string hanging down here. It was an empty room, except for a table with a bunch of crap on it — some papers and scissors and stuff. And she’d bring them in, and she’d say, “This is an IQ test and it determines how well you do in life. Would you tie those two strings together?” So they’d take one string and they’d pull it over here and they couldn’t reach the other string. Still can’t reach it. And, basically, none of them could solve it. You bring in a second group of people, and you say, “Oh, before we start, I got this box of candy, and I don’t eat candy. Would you like the box of candy?” And turns out they liked it, and it made them happy — not very happy, but a little bit of happy. And guess what — they solved the problem. And it turns out that when you’re anxious you squirt neural transmitters in the brain, which focuses you makes you depth-first. And when you’re happy — what we call positive valence — you squirt dopamine into the prefrontal lobes, which makes you a breadth-first problem solver: you’re more susceptible to interruption; you do out-of-the-box thinking. That’s what brainstorming is about, right? With brainstorming we make you happy, we play games, and we say, “No criticism,” and you get all these weird, neat ideas. But in fact, if that’s how you always were you’d never get any work done because you’d be working along and say, “Oh, I got a new way of doing it.” So to get work done, you’ve got to set a deadline, right? You’ve got be anxious. The brain works differently if you’re happy. Things work better because you’re more creative. You get a little problem, you say, “Ah, I’ll figure it out.” No big deal. There’s something I call the visceral level of processing, and there will be visceral-level design. Biology — we have co-adapted through biology to
like bright colors. That’s especially good that mammals and primates like fruits and bright plants, because you eat the fruit and you thereby spread the seed. There’s an amazing amount of stuff that’s built into the brain. We dislike bitter tastes, we dislike loud sounds, we dislike hot temperatures, cold temperatures. We dislike scolding voices. We dislike frowning faces; we like symmetrical faces, etc., etc. So that’s the visceral level. In design, you can express visceral in lots of ways, like the choice of type fonts and the red for hot, exciting. Or the 1963 Jaguar: It’s actually a crummy car, falls apart all the time, but the owners love it. And it’s beautiful — it’s in the Museum of Modern Art. A water bottle: You buy it because of the bottle, not because of the water. And when people are finished, they don’t throw it away. They keep it for — you know, it’s like the old wine bottles, you keep it for decoration or maybe fill it with water again, which proves it’s not the water. It’s all about the visceral experience. The middle level of processing is the behavioral level and that’s actually where most of our stuff gets done. Visceral is subconscious, you’re unaware of it. Behavioral is subconscious, you’re unaware of it. Almost everything we do is subconscious. I’m walking around the stage — I’m not attending to the control of my legs. I’m doing a lot; most of my talk is subconscious; it has been rehearsed and thought about a lot. Most of what we do is subconscious. Automatic behavior — skilled behavior — is subconscious, controlled by the behavioral side. And behavioral design is all about feeling in control, which includes usability, understanding — but also the feel and heft. That’s why the Global knives are so neat. They’re so nicely balanced, so sharp, that you really feel you’re in control of the cutting. Or, just driving a high-performance sports car over a demanding curb — again, feeling that you are in complete control of the environment. Or the sensual feeling. This is a Kohler shower, a waterfall shower, and actually, all those knobs beneath are also showerheads. It will squirt you all around and you can stay in that shower for hours — and not waste water, by the way, because it recirculates the same dirty water. (Laughter) Or this — this is a really neat teapot I found at high tea at The Four Seasons Hotel in Chicago. It’s a Ronnefeldt tilting teapot. That’s kind of what the teapot looks like but the way you use it is you lay it on its back, and you put tea in, and then you fill it with water. The water then seeps over the tea. And the tea is sitting in this stuff to the right — the tea is to the right of this line. There’s a little ledge inside, so the tea is sitting there and the water is filling it up like that. And when the tea is ready, or almost ready, you tilt it. And that means the tea is partially covered while it completes the brewing. And when it’s finished, you put it vertically, and now the tea is — you remember — above this line and the water only comes to here — and so it keeps the tea out. On top of that, it communicates, which is what emotion does. Emotion is all about acting; emotion is really about acting. It’s being safe in the world. Cognition is about understanding the world, emotion is about interpreting it — saying good, bad, safe, dangerous, and getting us ready to act, which is why the muscles tense or relax. And that’s why we can tell the emotion of somebody else — because their muscles are acting, subconsciously, except that we’ve evolved to make the facial muscles really rich with emotion. Well, this has emotions if you like, because it signals the waiter that, “Hey, I’m finished. See — upright.” And the waiter can come by and say, “Would you like more water?” It’s kind of neat. What a wonderful design. And the third level is reflective, which is, if you like the superego, it’s a little part of the brain that has no control over what you do, no control over the — doesn’t see the senses, doesn’t control the muscles. It looks over what’s going on. It’s that little voice in your head that’s watching and saying, “That’s good. That’s bad.” Or, “Why are you doing that? I don’t understand.” It’s that little voice in your head that’s the seat of consciousness. Here’s a great reflective product. Owners of the Hummer have said, “You know I’ve owned many cars in my life — all sorts of exotic cars, but never have I had a car that attracted so much attention.” It’s about attention. It’s about their image, not about the car. If you want a more positive model — this is the GM car. And the reason you might buy it now is because you care about the environment. And you’ll buy it to protect the environment, even though the first few cars are going to be really expensive and not perfected. But that’s reflective design as well. Or an expensive watch, so you can impress people — “Oh gee, I didn’t know you had that watch.” As opposed to this one, which is a pure behavioral watch, which probably keeps better time than the $13,000 watch I just showed you. But it’s ugly. This is a clear Don Norman watch. And what’s neat is sometimes you pit one emotion against the other, the visceral fear of falling against the reflective state saying, “It’s OK. It’s OK. It’s safe. It’s safe.” If that amusement park were rusty and falling apart, you’d never go on the ride. So, it’s pitting one against the other. The other neat thing … (Laughter) So Jake Cress is this furniture maker, and he makes this unbelievable set of furniture. And this is his chair with claw, and the poor little chair has lost its ball and it’s trying to get it back before anybody notices. And what’s so neat about it is how you accept that story. And that’s what’s nice about emotion. So that’s the new me. I’m only saying positive things from now on. (Laughter) (Applause)

100 thoughts on “The three ways that good design makes you happy | Don Norman

  1. I quoted and summarized some good parts 3:55 "Pleasant thing work better" 4:45 "Fear makes you focus" 5:55 "when you are anxious, you get stuck, if you are happy you get more idea flow into your brain" 8:15 "Behavior design is all about feel of your control. Most are done unconscious"

  2. In response to the:
    4 months ago
    Let it be understood that expensive does NOT always mean wasteful, yet it depends upon (in this case) the product you are using. To have a vehicle (such as a Honda Accord) that can do the same duties (getting you from point A to B safely, quietly,efficiently) already demonstrates that to command a higher price with "frills" such as a EXPENSIVE mercedes Benz, shows a disregard for practicality and for social responsiblity & insensitivity

  3. i absolutely love intellectual talks and stumbles like this because it explains the world around you in a different light

  4. I honestly think this guy has a very narrow concept of beauty. The majority of what he says just reflects that he has a lot of money and is trying to buy fun and happiness… a gold plated juicer he doesn't even use… come on people.

  5. @fionamonne He may have worked really hard to buy a gold plated juicer, good for him, but in all reality his fascination with material things make him appear a fairly sad and boring individual (to me)

  6. @kasanemo I agree, I think his fascination with material bobbles is just plain pathetic. He reminds me of my deeply unhappy father who only keeps the appearance of happiness afloat by buying whatever "pretty" (and usually ridiculously expensive) item he fancies. No matter how useless and completely unnecessary the item is. Honestly his explanation is lacking a lot.

  7. This guy is more interested in the superficial beauty of design then the internal beauty of design, which I believe to be quite foolish

  8. @achilleask Well… Sure.. the teapot is one example.. but this guy is really just pointing out a cool teapot.. why doesn't he design something practical and useful instead of showing us stuff we will see on some blog tomorrow

  9. @25soraya02 That's kind of the point he's making here — that what he's said in the past needed to be said, but that there is also room for aesthetics that go beyond the merely practical. Things that serve a particular function need to be first and foremost functional and usable, but they can also be beautiful while sacrificing nothing. And there is room in the world as well for things whose only function is beauty.

  10. wow , that teapot will receive a lot of criticism by the norman you knew in " the design of everyday things"

  11. Not a bad speech at all but there's one important thing that I think it's missing although I understand the point of the talk was not an "open minding sceneario" rather a sneak peak on how design in terms of aesthetics combined with function can have an impact on our brain but the important thing that is missing here in my opinion is that those principles of aesthetics and visual pleasure that he's talking about are learnt by social behavior and culture, the CASIO kinda watch can be ugly for some people but it's fancy and trendy for some others in the same geographical spot but in different time ages so it's almost impossible to predict or to know wheter a product can be loved or considered "neat" for a broad majority of people but anyway I thought it was a nice speech ^^

  12. The bottom line there is we should know how to develop a design which makes the consumers happy and as a result creates a successful product in the market. 

  13. went over my head. i got what levels/types of thought processes occur when one looks at an object and assesses it's design instictively, i got the breath first/depth first solving part, but could not grasp the answer to the question "what are the 3 ways that good design makes you happy", which is the topic of the talk.

  14. he mentioned a few cars, so I guess industrial design must have something in common with automotive design, am I right? cuz' if that's true that's what I'm studing 😀

  15. I'm studying the Gestalt principles as applied to software design and this lecture falls nicely into place. everything seems to make sense once you understand the basic rules of good design

  16. I disagree with his 'reflective' category- the way he pus it, reflective seems to mean being aware of what the other person is going to say about your product choice- that doesn't tie in at all with the word 'reflective' or the idea of reflection.

    A good talk otherwise. Norman always comes up with good real-world examples- There's a book I read by him some time ago-he comes up with examples that a lot of people seem to miss, such as salt-shakers!

  17. Humorous, entertaining, shrewd in some points, and memorable.Don Norman has used all three emotional designs within his presentation of  “emotional design” making this unforgettable lesson. I can only assume that was his intent, just brilliantly done.

  18. That is so interesting. I am reading Donald Norman's reading on design of everyday things at 11pm. And I am so tired. But this video makes me energetic again!As a definite type of visual learner, thanks for people who made and uploaded it.

  19. The teapot is one the most awful reinventing of wheel i've seen in awhile.. First, it is overtly complex for no real function, requires user to carefully rotate the vessel containing hot liquids absolutely right way, it can topple over, the lid will drop off when tilted to pour the tea (i see there is counterbalance weight in the lid but this doesn't not make me feel it is safe) and the worst: you are tilting it, in the direction where there is an opening at the top edge.. Meaning, the liquid level has to be correct, any overfill or even too much tilt in a hurry will pour hot liquids out from the top. The function is to keep leaves out but there is no strain of sift of any kind, just a internal ledge… If you have made tea you will know that not all parts of it float.. so you will have stuff in the water anyway.

    I don't know if that is meant to be a joke though, it is so stupid and cumbersome, it does not explain how to use by just looking at it. It can not work without further modifications to the internal container shape, lid has to be locked and watertight.. Making it in the end when fully optimized, half effective in it's main task… There are plenty of better solutions how to strain the leaves, like.. i don't know, sifts and strains that collect solids from water, like we have been doing the last, i'm not sure, 10 000 years?

  20. I find him so intriguing I had to go out and buy his book! It was as interesting as it was informative!

  21. The G shock is not ugly, people dont buy expensive watches just to impress friends, more likely enjoy horology. Don Norman. Just a man who got there first. and is now behind. But he looks so cute and cuddly

  22. I will buy and read your book "Design and Emotion". The book "Design of Everyday things" helps me a lot as design. Thank you, Mr. Norman!

  23. He claims that when we are anxious we do depth-first search and when we are happy we do breadth-first search. Interesting thought

  24. I was reading the artcle on user friendly design and agreed on everything.. you see technology should make our live easy ..instead now is hard to deal with things…mostly software at the job site, it seems to me that we spend more time now than ever dealing with the IT dept. than before this "cloud" thing……ex. you show to work ; the system is down…you forgot your password…….you call IT and….WAIT ………OK…so after 30 minutes you are in but now the printer is not try to fix it..still no print you check the connection..wait – is wireless… call IT Again…they ask for remote access, fixed and you are ready to start working….nope…the system is doing and "update" and the internet is SLOOWW………so at the end is 11:00 am in the morning and your productivity is O cero…thanks to technology………way to go human race…………………?

  25. Watching this video as part of my IDF course, and I love it, but every time he said 'squirt,' I laughed like a five-year-old. =D

  26. Watching this for a Media Communications class. Easy to understand and entertaining with your little jokes. Well done.

  27. 1. Visceral = subconscious : red, font types,
    2. Behavioral = feeling in control : driving a fast car
    Emotion – good/bad : communicates
    3. Reflective – no control of senses or muscles.

  28. Mostly quite good (I was a graphic designer) and I agree with a lot of what he said but his grey suit jacket (business uniform – I hate them) wasn't fun at all = why not wear a bright flowery one or something?!

  29. I have read four books on design psychology written by Norman.The design of everyday things、living with complexity、emotional design and the design of future things…he teachs me a lot about design.

  30. 4:57

    Could you please describe the name of the experiment Dr. Alice Isen conducted, and what year it took place? I'd be interested in looking more into this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *